IT博客汇
  • 首页
  • 精华
  • 技术
  • 设计
  • 资讯
  • 扯淡
  • 权利声明
  • 登录 注册

    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:[2662] 错误解析

    PDSERVICE发表于 2016-06-01 06:35:51
    love 0

     

    ORA-600[2662]错误的触发原因是ORACLE发现居然有数据块的SCN号要比我系统当前的SCN还要大,这是不被允许的,这通常说明 在前滚过程中应用的redo是不完整的,这导致系统SCN要比一些已经写到磁盘上的块的SCN还小一点。对于这种问题常见的方案就是调整SCN adjust scn 《手动递增SCN号的几种方法:How to increase System Change Number by manual》

    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:[2662]

     

    如果自己搞不定可以找诗檀软件专业ORACLE数据库修复团队成员帮您恢复!

    诗檀软件专业数据库修复团队

    服务热线 : 400-690-3643   备用电话: 13764045638    邮箱:service@parnassusdata.com

     

    与ORA-00600[2662]相关一些 bug如下:

     

     

    Bug 4453449
    Abstract: Flashback to guaranteed restore point in orphan inc may result in ORA-600[3020]
    Versions affected: 10.2.0.1
    Fixed in versions: 10.2.0.2 & 11.0
    Backportable: Yes
    Symptoms:
    The symptom of this bug include ORA-600[3020], ORA-600[2662] after flashback
    database and ORA-600[flashback_validation] during flashback database.
    There may also be other symptoms.
    Details:
    ORA-600[3020] / ORA-600 [2662] / ORA-600 [flashback_validation] can occur
    after/during multiple flashback/recovery through multiple database resetlogs
    without opening the database. There may also be other symptoms which appear as
    recovery related corruption errors.
    Workaround:
    1. If you flashback a crashed primary database, follow flashback database with open
    resetlogs. Alternatively, if you'd like to completely undo flashback database,
    follow flashback database with recover database without shutting down the
    instance first.
    2. Restore backup and recover.
    Patch details:
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any platform and versions.
    Bug 2899477 (Unpublished)
    Abstract:ORA-600[2662] CAUSES INSTANCE CRASH
    Versions affected: 9.2.0.4
    Fixed in versions: 9.2.0.4 & 10.1
    Backportable: Yes
    Symptoms:
    When you have a corrupted SCN and if the corruption is found in selexe,
    getting uninitialized selenv from opiexe, then this may be the bug.
    
    
    Details:
    It is possible for an uninitialized variable to be passed
    on for a select statement which could result in a false
    ORA-600 [2662] error.
    Workaround:
    None
    Patch details:
    One-off patch available for few platforms on top of 9.2.0.4
    Check the Metalink for Patch 2899477 availability.
    Bug 2764106
    Abstract: ORA-600 [2662] BRINGS THE DATABASE DOWN
    Versions affected: 8.1.7.4 & 9.2.0.4
    Fixed in versions: 9.2.0.5 & 10.1
    Backportable: Yes
    Symptoms:
    OERI(2662) even The dependent scn present in the disk blocks are fine.
    Details:
    A false ORA-600 [2662] error can occur on SELECT operations
    which can result in an instance crash even though there is no
    underlying problem with the on disk SCN.
    Workaround:
    None
    Patch details:
    One-off patch available for few platforms on top of 8.1.7.4 & 9.2.0.4
    Check the Metalink for Patch 2764106 availability.
    Bug 2216823 (Unpublished)
    Abstract:OERI(2662) REPORTED WHEN REUSING TEMPFILE WITH RESTORED DB
    Versions affected: 9.2.0
    Fixed in versions: 10.1.0
    Backportable: No
    Symptoms:
    eg:
    1. Create a TEMP tablespace.
    2. Shutdown a database.
    3. Copy control file, data files, and log files to another directory
    (but not tempfile).
    4. Restart a database.
    5. Create a temporary table and insert into it, thereby causing tempfile
    to be updated.
    6. Shutdown a database.
    7. Restore a database.
    8. Restart a database.
    9. Create a temporary table and insert into it.
    10. Commit
    ^- ORA-600 [2662]
    Details:
    ORA-600 [2662] can occur when reusing a TEMPFILE with
    a restored database.
    Workaround:
    The workaround is not to use the pre-existing tempfile.
    Instead either backup the tempfile with rest of the database
    or remove the tempfile then recreate a new tempfile once the
    database is open.
    Patch details:
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any platforms and versions
    
    Bug 2054025 (Unpublished)
    
    Abstract:ORA-600 [2662] RELATED TO KDIT.C
    Versions affected: 9.0.1.2
    Fixed in versions: 9.0.1.3 9.2.0.1
    Backportable: No
    Symptoms:
    OERI:2662 possible on new TEMPORARY index block
    Details:
    ORA-600 [2662] possible on new TEMPORARY index block
    Workaround:
    None
    Patch details:
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any platforms and versions
    Bug 851959
    Abstract : ORA-600 [2662] OCCURRED DURING CREATE SNAPSHOT AT MASTER SITE
    Details :
    It is possible to get ORA-600 [2662] caused by mis-adjustment of the Oracle7 SCN (in PARALLEL SERVER mode) when an Oracle8 instance selects from
    it over a DBLINK
    Version affected : 7.3.4.X
    Fixed in version: 7.3.4.5
    Workaround :
    None
    Patch details :
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any versions/platforms.
    Bug 647927 (Unpublished)
    Abstract : LOCK PROCESS DIES WITH ORA-600 [2662], [0], [40057943], [0], [40063994]
    Version affected 8.0.4.X
    Fixed in version : 8.0.4.2 8.0.5.0
    Symptoms :
    Digital Unix ONLY: OERI:2662 could occur under heavy load
    Workaround :
    None
    Patch details :
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any versions/platforms.
    Bug 5612217 (Unpublished)
    Abstract : ORA-7445 [KDKBIN] LEADING TO ORA-600 [2662] DUE TO BUFFER CORRUPTION
    Version affected : 9.2.0.X
    Workaround :
    None
    Patch details :
    One-off patch available for few platforms on top of 9.2.0.7
    Check the Metalink for Patch 5612217 availability.
    Bug 4599505 (Unpublished)
    Abstract : ORA-600 [2662] error
    Version affected : 10.2.0.X
    
    
    Fixed in version : 11.0
    Symptoms :
    ORA-600[2662] after flashback database.
    Workaround :
    This problem may disappear by itself after the database has been opened for a while and its SCN has passed the SCN of the problematic block. This is
    however not a guaranteed workaround
    Patch details :
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any versions/platforms.
    Bug 2998110
    Abstract :ORA-600 [2662] LARGE QUERIES ON STANDBY WITH LOCALLY MANAGED TMP TBLSP
    Version affected : 9.2.0.X 10.1.0.X
    Fixed in version : 10.2
    Symptoms :
    The scn of the tempfiles is advanced but not on any other files
    when the database is opened in read only mode.
    Workaround :
    1) Increase the sort_area_size to avoid sort on disk thus avoiding the use of the tempfiles
    --OR--
    2) After opening the database read only and BEFORE executing any queries
    against the standby database, drop and recreate the tempfiles.
    --OR--
    3) If you are on 10.1 release you can set the following parameter:
    _init_tempfile_on_open=TRUE
    in your init.ora/spfile and bounce the database.
    Setting this parameter will clear all tempfile bitmaps when the database is opened
    so the database open may be take a little longer.
    Patch details :
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any versions/platforms.
    This bug is fixed in 10.2 and is not backportable to previous releases.
    Note 356583.1 has been linked to this scenario.
    Bug 3517013 (Unpublished)
    Abstract :OPEN DB RESETLOG AFTER FLASHBACK DB FAILS ORA-600 [KCLCHKBLK_4], [1904]
    Symptoms :
    1) When restored the database from backup and did an incomplete recovery.
    2) Opened the database with resetlogs.
    3) After opening the database, you start getting following errors:
    ORA-00600 [kclchkblk_4]
    ORA-00600 [2662]
    4) Stack trace is:- kclchkblk kcbzib kcbgcur ktfbhget ktftfcload
    Cause :
    1)
    Error, ORA-600[KCLCHKBLK_4], is signaled because the SCN in a tempfile block
    is too high. The same reason caused the ORA-600[2662]s in the alert logs.
    2)
    This issue is because the tempfiles may not get reinitialized during open
    resetlogs.
    Patch details :
    Currently there is no one-off patch available for any versions/platforms.
    Note 275902.1 has been linked to this scenario and solution
    given under this note.
    
    Many other bugs were filed with development for this issue.
    Those bugs are not progressed due to
    -- Lack of response from the customers
    -- one-time occurances
    -- Vendor OS Problem


沪ICP备19023445号-2号
友情链接