IT博客汇
  • 首页
  • 精华
  • 技术
  • 设计
  • 资讯
  • 扯淡
  • 权利声明
  • 登录 注册

    Decoding the Mystery: How to Interpret Regression Output in R Like a Champ

    Steven P. Sanderson II, MPH发表于 2023-12-14 05:00:00
    love 0
    [This article was first published on Steve's Data Tips and Tricks, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
    Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

    Introduction

    Ever run an R regression and stared at the output, feeling like you’re deciphering an ancient scroll? Fear not, fellow data enthusiasts! Today, we’ll crack the code and turn those statistics into meaningful insights.

    Let’s grab our trusty R arsenal and set up the scene:

    • Dataset: mtcars (a classic car dataset in R)
    • Regression: Linear model with mpg as the dependent variable (miles per gallon) and all other variables as independent variables (predictors)

    Step 1: Summon the Stats Gods with “summary()”

    First, cast your R spell with summary(lm(mpg ~ ., data = mtcars)). This incantation conjures a table of coefficients, p-values, and other stats. Don’t panic if it looks like a cryptic riddle! We’ll break it down:

    model <- lm(mpg ~ ., data = mtcars)
    
    summary(model)
    Call:
    lm(formula = mpg ~ ., data = mtcars)
    
    Residuals:
        Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
    -3.4506 -1.6044 -0.1196  1.2193  4.6271 
    
    Coefficients:
                Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)  
    (Intercept) 12.30337   18.71788   0.657   0.5181  
    cyl         -0.11144    1.04502  -0.107   0.9161  
    disp         0.01334    0.01786   0.747   0.4635  
    hp          -0.02148    0.02177  -0.987   0.3350  
    drat         0.78711    1.63537   0.481   0.6353  
    wt          -3.71530    1.89441  -1.961   0.0633 .
    qsec         0.82104    0.73084   1.123   0.2739  
    vs           0.31776    2.10451   0.151   0.8814  
    am           2.52023    2.05665   1.225   0.2340  
    gear         0.65541    1.49326   0.439   0.6652  
    carb        -0.19942    0.82875  -0.241   0.8122  
    ---
    Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
    
    Residual standard error: 2.65 on 21 degrees of freedom
    Multiple R-squared:  0.869, Adjusted R-squared:  0.8066 
    F-statistic: 13.93 on 10 and 21 DF,  p-value: 3.793e-07

    Coefficients

    These tell you how much, on average, the dependent variable changes for a one-unit increase in the corresponding independent variable (holding other variables constant). For example, a coefficient of 0.05 for cyl means for every one more cylinder, mpg is expected to increase by 0.05 miles per gallon, on average.

    model$coefficients
    (Intercept)         cyl        disp          hp        drat          wt 
    12.30337416 -0.11144048  0.01333524 -0.02148212  0.78711097 -3.71530393 
           qsec          vs          am        gear        carb 
     0.82104075  0.31776281  2.52022689  0.65541302 -0.19941925 

    P-values

    These whisper secrets about significance. A p-value less than 0.05 (like for wt!) means the observed relationship between the variable and mpg is unlikely to be due to chance. The following are the individual p-values for each variable:

    summary(model)$coefficients[, 4]
    (Intercept)         cyl        disp          hp        drat          wt 
     0.51812440  0.91608738  0.46348865  0.33495531  0.63527790  0.06325215 
           qsec          vs          am        gear        carb 
     0.27394127  0.88142347  0.23398971  0.66520643  0.81217871 

    Now the overall p-value for the model:

    model_p <- function(.model) {
      
      # Get p-values
      fstat <- summary(.model)$fstatistic
      p <- pf(fstat[1], fstat[2], fstat[3], lower.tail = FALSE)
      print(p)
    }
    
    model_p(.model = model)
           value 
    3.793152e-07 

    Step 2: Let’s Talk Turkey - Interpreting the Numbers

    Coefficients

    Think of them as slopes. A positive coefficient means the dependent variable increases with the independent variable. Negative? The opposite! For example, disp has a negative coefficient, so bigger engines (larger displacement) tend to have lower mpg.

    P-values

    Imagine a courtroom. A low p-value is like a strong witness, convincing you the relationship between the variables is real. High p-values (like for am!) are like unreliable witnesses, leaving us unsure.

    Step 3: Zoom Out - The Bigger Picture

    R-squared

    This tells you how well the model explains the variation in mpg. A value close to 1 is fantastic, while closer to 0 means the model needs work. In our case, it’s not bad, but there’s room for improvement.

    summary(model)$r.squared
    [1] 0.8690158

    Residuals

    These are the differences between the actual mpg values and the model’s predictions. Analyzing them can reveal hidden patterns and model issues.

    data.frame(model$residuals)
                        model.residuals
    Mazda RX4              -1.599505761
    Mazda RX4 Wag          -1.111886079
    Datsun 710             -3.450644085
    Hornet 4 Drive          0.162595453
    Hornet Sportabout       1.006565971
    Valiant                -2.283039036
    Duster 360             -0.086256253
    Merc 240D               1.903988115
    Merc 230               -1.619089898
    Merc 280                0.500970058
    Merc 280C              -1.391654392
    Merc 450SE              2.227837890
    Merc 450SL              1.700426404
    Merc 450SLC            -0.542224699
    Cadillac Fleetwood     -1.634013415
    Lincoln Continental    -0.536437711
    Chrysler Imperial       4.206370638
    Fiat 128                4.627094192
    Honda Civic             0.503261089
    Toyota Corolla          4.387630904
    Toyota Corona          -2.143103442
    Dodge Challenger       -1.443053221
    AMC Javelin            -2.532181498
    Camaro Z28             -0.006021976
    Pontiac Firebird        2.508321011
    Fiat X1-9              -0.993468693
    Porsche 914-2          -0.152953961
    Lotus Europa            2.763727417
    Ford Pantera L         -3.070040803
    Ferrari Dino            0.006171846
    Maserati Bora           1.058881618
    Volvo 142E             -2.968267683

    Bonus Tip: Visualize the data! Scatter plots and other graphs can make relationships between variables pop.

    Remember: Interpreting regression output is an art, not a science. Use your domain knowledge, consider the context, and don’t hesitate to explore further!

    So next time you face regression output, channel your inner R wizard and remember:

    • Coefficients whisper about slopes and changes.
    • P-values tell tales of significance, true or false.
    • R-squared unveils the model’s explanatory magic.
    • Residuals hold hidden clues, waiting to be discovered.

    With these tools in your belt, you’ll be interpreting regression output like a pro in no time! Now go forth and conquer the data, fellow R adventurers!

    Note: This is just a brief example. For a deeper dive, explore specific diagnostics, model selection techniques, and other advanced topics to truly master the art of regression interpretation.

    To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Steve's Data Tips and Tricks.

    R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
    Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
    Continue reading: Decoding the Mystery: How to Interpret Regression Output in R Like a Champ


沪ICP备19023445号-2号
友情链接